Category Archives: Biography

True History of the Kelly Gang

Leave a reply

True History of the Kelly Gang                    4 stars

Although violent in the extreme, I recommend seeing this modern telling of the story of Ned Kelly, the Irish Catholic outlaw who terrorized Australia in the late 1800’s. George Mackay of 1917 plays the violent adult Ned to perfection as we follow his very troubled life running afoul of authorities (all British) in the Australian outback. The filming of a desolate landscape contributes to the bleak outlook that director Justin Kurzel wants to convey. The varied score that includes punk rock pieces gives the movie a surrealistic feeling. This is a violent, brutal and bloody film that will put many viewers off, but it is necessary to tell what life was like for the Irish lower class under British rule. The first part of the movie shows Ned Kelly as a young boy growing up dirt poor with a drunk Irish father and a foul mouthed mother (Essie Davis of Babadook). The young Ned has encounters with cruel individuals that will form his character including Sgt. O’Neil (Charlie Hunnan) and the thief Harry Power (Russell Crowe). Crowe’s time on screen is short so it is almost criminal that he gets top casting credit while the boy playing Kelly, who is on screen much longer is barely mentioned. Other notable actors playing scoundrels are Nicolas Hoult as a British cop who teasingly alternates between being Kelly’s friend and trying to bring him down, and Marlon Williams as George King, an American who seeks to take advantage of the poor Kelly family. Thomasin McKenzie of Lost Girls and Jojo Rabbit portrays Kelly’s love and mother of his daughter. Besides the violence, there is a theme of cross dressing as the Kelly gang wears flowing dresses while committing their crimes, a practice meant to instill fear in their victims apparently originating in Ireland. None of the characters have any redeeming features, all contributing to the lawless environment they find themselves in. The film has a very violent shootout scene to end on featuring strobe lighting and a seemingly endless supply of blood. This film is not for everyone, but a good one for lovers of Westerns. I strongly advise that you see the movie with closed captions as I find much of the Australian dialect is difficult to understand.

Mank

Leave a reply

Mank                    4 ½ stars

Mank, now available on Netflix, is a rarity as it portrays 1930’s Hollywood while also being filmed in the style of the thirties. Directed by David Fincher (of The Social Network and Gone Girl), it stars Gary Oldman as Hollywood screenwriter Herman Mankiewicz who is best known for writing the screenplay of Orson Welles’ masterpiece Citizen Kane. The film is in black and white and looks much like the movies of the thirties, not only by the tones and shots on the screen, but also by the quick paced dialogue of that era. At the beginning we learn that in 1940 the young 24 year old phenomenon Orson Welles has been given free reign to make whatever movie he wants with whatever resources he needs. Welles has chosen Mankiewicz to write a screenplay about a corrupt media mogul who has even greater ambitions. Throughout the movie we see Mank confined to a bed following a car accident as he dictates to a secretary and receives visits from associates and occasional phone calls from Welles. The rest of the story is done in flash backs to Mankiewicz activities in the thirties where we really get a view of what old Hollywood was like, featuring such figures as Louis B. Mayer of MGM and an aging William Randolph Hearst, the ultrarich media mogul. Amanda Seyfried portrays Marion Davies, Hearst’s mistress and confidant of Mankiewicz. There is a good deal of social commentary on the politics of the age, so it helps to have some historical background. It is set in the midst of the depression at the beginning of the Roosevelt administration with labor strikes going on and with Hitler creating a stir in Europe. There is a socialist movement going on in California with writer Upton Sinclair challenging incumbent Republican Frank Merriam for the Governor’s office. The scene featuring a gathering of big wigs and socialites at Hearst castle engaged in a political discussion is fascinating as the socialist leaning Mankiewicz goes toe to toe with the Republican backers in the room. Much like Welles film, Mank can be viewed as an indictment of the superrich who live off the backs of the workers that keep their enterprise going. It is really Oldman who makes the film work though he is much older than Mankiewicz was at the time. Mank leads the Academy Award nominations with a total of ten, including Beast Actor for Oldman, Best Supporting Actress for Amanda Seyfried, Best Picture and Best Director for David Fincher. The screenplay was written by David Fincher’s father Jack who died in 2003 so never got to see it become reality.

The Alto Knights

Leave a reply

The Alto Knights               2 ½ stars

The latest movie about the mob wars of the 1950’s is The Alto Knights by director Barry Levinson which is out now in theaters. Levinson is probably best known for the movies Rain Man, Good Morning, Vietnam and Bugsy. This time he applies his creative skills to a gangster movie that pits one high level mob boss against an aging underling bent on expanding his realm on the streets of New York. Now, if you are going to make a gangster movie about the Italian mafia, you can’t do any better than casting the eternal gangster, Robert DeNiro in the lead role. And if you want to do even better why not cast DeNiro in two roles in the same movie? That’s what Levinson has done here with DeNiro playing Frank Costello, the boss of the gang in New York, who is in his later years and wants desperately to retire. The only thing is that his childhood friend from the streets, Vito Genovese (also played by guess who? DeNiro) has returned from Italy where he was exiled for many years and now wants a bigger piece of the action, like it was during prohibition. For him this means getting into the narcotics business, something that has a much larger profile with the authorities than alcohol ever did. Frank is all about keeping things calm and steady, while Vito is a real hothead who wants to be feared and will not take No for an answer. Thus, the conflict is set up leading to an attempted hit on Frank. DeNiro is the expert at talking like an Italian gangster, speaking in the coded language we know from such films. He shows us his other side as Vito, whose temper flares at the slightest provocation, much like the roles we have seen Joe Pesci play. But as I was watching I could not help but think I was looking at the Robert DeNiro tribute show. Sure, the two characters look different with the help of some astounding makeup, and Vito is always seen in glasses, but I still wonder how hard could it be to find another grade A actor to play one of the roles? There has to be many such suitable men who could do a great job with it. It was entertaining to listen to the dialogue used by crime bosses, the type we have seen in such classics as Once Upon a Time in America, Good Fellas and Casino, but it eventually gets tiresome. And there is a lot of narration from the aged Frank telling how things used to be. The focus was more on the tension between the two characters than on any of the actual crimes or hits they carried out. In fact, there was surprisingly little violence in the movie. I can only think of three hits in the two-hour movie. I do have to credit Debra Messing in her role as Bobbie, Frank’s wife. It was a great departure from her comedic characters like Grace from Will and Grace. I almost didn’t recognize her at first. Anyway, if you want to see the great Robert DeNiro in a memorable gangster film, go back and see The Irishman from 2019. And if that isn’t enough there will always be The Godfather. Otherwise, forget about it.

Tesla/ The Current War

Tesla                                    2 stars

The Current War               3 stars

Within one year two movies were released about how the power of electricity was harnessed in America in the 1880’s and 1890’s. Both Tesla, directed by Michael Almereyda and The Current War, directed by Alfonso Gomez-Rejon cover the events when Thomas Edison and George Westinghouse were competing over the building of the fledgling powergrid that would light up American cities into the twentieth century. Immigrant Nikola Tesla also figures prominently in the stories with his designs of an electric motor that could efficiently utilize alternating current. While covering the same subject the two films are very different in focus and style. Tesla, of course centers on the life of the genius inventor from the Austro-Hungarian Empire with Ethan Hawke in the starring role who plays him as a moody, silent individual often lost in thought. He is more concerned with changing the future of mankind with his inventions than seeking personal gain. (He, of course, eventually loses his fortune and dies penniless.) Edison is portrayed by Kyle MacLachlan who is far too old for the part and Westinghouse is played by Jim Gaffigan to comic effect. The Current War stars Benedict Cumberbatch as the genius Thomas Edison who is fighting for DC current to be used as the basis for powering cities while Michael Shannon portrays brilliant businessman George Westinghouse who is selling the idea of alternating current as a more efficient means of transmitting power. As the title suggests the movie centers on the battle between the two over whose company will build and control the transmission of electric power across the country. Tesla (Nicholas Hoult) is a supporting character in The Current War who first works for Edison, goes on his own and then partners with Westinghouse. In both films it’s curious that the filmmakers chose to have Tesla speak without the hint of an accent which seems unlikely for the European immigrant. Wealthy entrepreneur J. P. Morgan features prominently in both movies (Donnie Keshawarz in Tesla and Matthew MacFadyen in The Current War) as the man who ultimately finances the whole enterprise. The style of the two films is what makes the difference between them. Tesla takes a post-modern artistic approach using the character of Anne Morgan, J. P. Morgan’s daughter, to tell the story as the woman who falls for Tesla while also narrating the background of the film’s people and events, but from our present using Google searches and iPads. There are other anachronisms used in the movie such as a cell phone and electric vacuum cleaner. I presume this is a way of showing the influence Tesla’s genius was to have on future developments, but I found it to be distracting. There are even fictional scenes such as an ice cream fight between Tesla and Edison that Anne fortunately tells us never happened. Another device used is to introduce characters without identifying them until later that I found to be confusing. By contrast The Current War is a biopic about the two men done strictly chronologically that puts the names of the characters on screen as each appears. It’s a less artistic approach but it gets the job done. The criticism I have with The Current War is the fast pace of it and quick editing. You need to pay attention, but it is less confusing than Tesla. Both are less than perfect films, but you will learn a lot from them, such as how the execution of a condemned prisoner was used by Edison to further his argument that Westinghouse’s alternating current was too dangerous to use around people. Tesla premiered at Sundance in 2020 while The Current War premiered at Toronto in 2017 and was then shelved for 2 years until its release in 2019.

The United States vs. Billie Holiday

The United States vs. Billie Holiday                           2 stars

There has been quite an abundance lately of films dealing with stories of racial injustice. The latest is Lee Daniels’ The United States vs. Billie Holiday that tells the life story of jazz icon, Billie Holiday, or at least part of it. It stars Andra Day as the legendary singer who was a star in the 1940’s and created a controversy by singing the song, “Strange Fruit”, so much so that the government was determined to get her to stop. I was familiar with the song and its connection to Holiday but was not aware of the story behind it. The song’s lyrics describe in graphic detail the scene of a lynching of black men, something people were aware of in the forties, but mostly would not speak of. The Narcotics Dept. of the FBI in the person of Harry Anslinger (Garrett Hedlund), federal agent is determined to make her stop singing it as the government is more interested in hiding the problem of the lynching of black men than it is in stopping them.  He does so by framing her with drug possession and he is aided by black agent Jimmie Fletcher (Trevante Rhodes of Moonlight) who infiltrates Holiday’s entourage. I found parts of the film hard to follow as some characters appeared for only a short while and others acted in such a way that I could not understand the motives for their actions. It is clear that few of those around the singer really cared for her and most were interested in their own gains. Fletcher is a hard one to understand as he is at first responsible for putting Holiday in jail and then has an affair with her. What a change that was! Two actors bringing comic relief are Miss Lawrence and Da’Vine Joy Randolph as part of Holiday’s entourage. The telling of her background was disjointed using a melodramatic way of showing her upbringing and her connection with a lynching. There is a comical interview scene with Leslie Jordan (whom Will & Grace fans will recognize instantly) as Reginald Lord Devine doing the questioning at a time late in Holiday’s career, inserted into the more chronological story. I felt it wasn’t done very effectively. We don’t get to hear the song Strange Fruit performed until well after the halfway point and though it is quite haunting it only shows up once. What we don’t get is any idea of how Holiday became so attached to it in the first place. Billie Holiday is known as the godmother of the civil rights movement before it was a movement and Andra Day does a remarkable performance portraying her. I just wish she was in a better movie about this historic icon.

Hillbilly Elegy

Hillbilly Elegy                      2 stars

Ron Howard’s Hillbilly Elegy is the screen adaptation of the J.D. Vance memoir about his life growing up in a dysfunctional family in Middletown, Ohio, but with roots in the hills of eastern Kentucky. We see J.D. in two parallel timelines, one as a teenager dealing with his abusive drug addicted mother Bev (Amy Adams) and the other as a Yale Law School student called home to handle his mother’s latest episode of a heroin overdose. The movie is a series of abusive situations in which the family reacts to Mom’s explosive temper, brought on by a lifetime of disappointments. The acting by Adams and especially Glenn Close as the Mamaw, the matriarch of the family is realistic. Close has been transformed with a wig and baggy T-shirts into a gruff meanspirited grandmother who uses tough love to keep her grandchildren from falling into the pattern of failure familiar to her family. (Though there is a scene where she sets her husband on fire, but never mind that.) Close deserves the Academy Award nomination she received for the role. Unfortunately, it takes more than good acting to make a good movie so Hillbilly Elegy doesn’t deserve the same praise and is hard to watch as the characters put themselves through such misery. I didn’t read the book which is reputed to be a social commentary on poor working-class white America. Sadly, the many social and political issues raised in the book did not carry over into the movie that can be described as a series of face-slapping, door-slamming and drug fueled abusive scenes. It’s a collection of talented actors in a movie in search of a purpose. The director of Cinderella Man and The Da Vinci Code has missed the mark with this one.

A Complete Unknown

A Complete Unknown   4 ½ stars

Legendary folk singer/song writer Bob Dylan finally gets the biopic treatment in A Complete Unknown, by Director James Mangold (who previously did the same for Johnny Cash in Walk the Line). The movie focuses on the short span of time from Dylan first appearing on the music scene in Greenwich Village in 1961 to his rise to stardom in 1965. You can tell from the opening scenes you are in for a treat when the 20-year-old Bob Dylan, arriving in New York from Minnesota, seeks out his idol, an ailing Woody Guthrie (Scoot McNairy) in a hospital and sings ’Song to Woody’ which he personally wrote for Woody. Watching the private performance is folk singer Pete Seeger (Ed Norton) who was well known by this time. Both men can see that they will see more of this kid. Likewise, we the audience see something iconic in the actor portraying Dylan, Timothée Chalamet, who is already well known to movie audiences from appearances in Dune, Wonka and Don’t Look Up. He plays the notes and sings in a warbly voice that is more than just an impression. He gives a performance that raises your expectations for the movie wondering what he will do in later scenes. In the movie, Dylan forms relationships with people in the industry including Joan Baez, Seeger and management types like Albert Grossman. He crashes with girlfriend Sylvia (Elle Fanning) who, through her activist causes, gives Dylan an awareness of the crises headed for America, inspiring his songwriting. You can see why he wrote The Times, They Are a Changin’. It is through the relationships with these characters that we get a sense of how Dylan is changing and that he is charting his own course. I was glad that unlike some biopics the movie did not go into his upbringing, (think Rocketman and Ray) leaving some sense of mystery about him. Of course, the fact that Bob Dylan himself was a producer of the film probably has something to do with how he is portrayed. There are several different venues depicted from small nightclubs to the Newport Folk Festival, giving a sense of Dylan’s rising fame. The movie culminates at the popular music festival where the drama of whether Dylan will follow the tradition set by the festival or go full loud volume electric guitar. The critics say that there was much playing around with the events depicted, meaning the movie isn’t exactly accurate. Since I don’t remember anything of that time I can’t say, but it sure makes for some good movie drama.

Maria

Maria    4 stars

Director Pablo Larrain has constructed not so much a movie but a portrait of Maria Callas, one of the greatest female opera singers who ever lived. In Maria, Oscar winning actress, Angelina Jolie gives one of her best performances to date, completely breaking from the action roles she is known for. In the movie we follow Maria in her final days living in her extravagant Paris apartment in the 1970’s where she remembers her greatest past performances while self-medicating with a variety of drugs. Her only company is her faithful butler and her housemaid who watch over her religiously. Occasionally, she is visited by her doctor who urges caution in the face of her deteriorating condition. He advises that she should not attempt singing anymore as it puts too much stress on her frail body. Even so she still goes to a vacant theater where she attempts singing with the help of a supportive pianist. She is visited by a TV journalist who records her telling of the important times in her life. The journalist exists only in her mind though and has the same name as one of the drugs she is taking. She even relates her long relationship with shipping magnate Aristotle Onassis. Callas is framed in shots showing her almost in a trance, alternating to scenes of past opera performances made to look like old films of the fifties and sixties. Opera fans will adore hearing parts of pieces by Verdi, Bellini and Puccini in these segments. The voice of Callas is superb, apparently being a blend of Jolie’s voice and actual recordings of the opera star. The opera scenes not only serve to showcase Callas’s talent but also relate to parts of her life that she is thinking of in each particular scene. The production design of the street scenes in Paris and the fashion and contents of Callas’s apartment are done in such authentic detail you can imagine that you are really there. Of course, it is Angelina Jolie who delivers a performance that conveys the singer’s diva status as well as her lost sense of reality. Maria is nominated for one Academy Award, that being in Cinematography. The Academy did not see fit to nominate Jolie for another acting award, though she deserves it.

Dream Horse

Dream Horse                     4 stars

Dream Horse is a very traditional British feel good comedy about a middle aged Welsh couple living in a poor village who take on the task of raising a thoroughbred race horse. Toni Collette stars as Jan who used to raise prize winning livestock, but now breaks out of her dull routine and buys a mare on a whim. Since she and her arthritic ridden husband Brian can’t afford this venture on their own, they form a syndicate with some of the townsfolk and the result is a promising young horse to be named Dream Alliance. What follows are all the cliches you would expect in an underdog horse racing movie: the struggle of the training, the exciting first race with the heart-pounding stretch run, the moments of doubt and tragedy and ultimate triumph. Of course it all works to perfection in the film based on a real life story from Wales. Collette can do no wrong in her role as Jan. (For a different kind of role for Toni Collette see the horror movie Hereditary.) Damian Lewis plays a sharp local accountant who joins the syndicate having previously put his family in peril with a gambling problem. The story was actually previously told in a documentary from a few years ago called Dark Horse. I missed that one, but this film was a pleasure to watch.

Judas and the Black Messiah

Judas and the Black Messiah                       5 stars

For many years I have heard the name Fred Hampton and the story of the Black Panthers but never really understood the importance of his name and what he stood for in late sixties Chicago. In Judas and the Black Messiah, Shaka King gives us his version of the story of the Black Panther Chicago chapter chairman and the FBI informant, Bill O’Neal and the ultimate murder of Hampton at the hands of the FBI and the Chicago police. Daniel Kaluuya (of Queen & Slim and Get Out) gives a career high star (and Oscar nominated) performance of Hampton with his speeches showing the rhetorical skills of the Black Panther leader and his vision of purpose of saving the downtrodden with the founding of the Rainbow Coalition. The events of the film take place only months after the Martin Luther King assassination and show that unlike King, Fred Hampton was not above seeking violence against the police. LaKeith Stanfield (of The Photograph and Sorry to Bother You) plays Bill O’Neal, who was only a teenager when the FBI picked him up impersonating an FBI agent and coerced him into joining the Black Panthers and becoming an informant on Hampton’s movements and actions. Stanfield, who also received an Oscar nomination for the film, brilliantly portrays O’Neal as the conflicted man who believes in the Panther cause while at the same time continuing with the FBI plan as he is forced by his FBI handler, Roy Mitchell (Jesse Plemons). The title describes the situation well as the Judas is torn by admiration and guilt while being completely helpless in freeing himself from his situation. The film gives us additional context by showing actual footage of the real O’Neal in his final 1989 interview telling of his action before he finally committed suicide. It is very illuminating that this film came out in the year following the George Floyd murder at the hands of police and the unrest that followed. It shows that some things have not really changed in fifty years. The film running time exceeds two hours and may be slow in sections, but I am very glad that it was made and that it is being seen by wide audiences.