Category Archives: War

Shadow in the Cloud

Leave a reply

Shadow in the Cloud                       4 stars

In this year’s Shadow in the Cloud we follow a young female pilot, Maude (Chloe Grace Moretz) on a secret mission on a World War II B-17 bomber out of New Zealand. This is without a doubt the best B-movie of the year so far. You can tell it’s a B-movie at the outset by the seventies style rock music so you know you are in for a treat. Maude is a last minute passenger on the mission and the all male crew is not at all happy about it, as they berate her with sexist language and force her to ride in the Sperry turret in the belly of the plane, the only place where there is room. We soon see that she can handle herself well in the aircraft as she maneuvers the turret, and fires the machine gun at approaching enemy aircraft. Then there is the matter of an actual gremlin on the outside of the plane who is determined to rip it apart and kill everyone inside. For much of the movie we only see Maude in the turret as she must content with the abusive crew, enemy planes and the destructive creature. After we see the premise of the movie, things only get more intense as Maude performs incredible stunts with determination to stay alive and defeat both monster and Jap fighters with actions that only get more and more preposterous. Like any good B-movie the audience must take it all in stride and just go along for the action. Moretz is very convincing in the role making us believe she is a 40’s star who can dish it out better than she gets. Shadow in the Cloud is the best B-movie I’ve seen since 2018’s Revenge, also a movie where the female lead must take command of life-threatening situations with implausible results. The movie is available on Hulu and is recommended for all action movie lovers!

Atropia

Leave a reply

Atropia 4 suns

As Atropia opens we see the streets of an Iraqi village with street vendors, animals and men with head scarves. Then we see some American Army vehicles come down the street with soldiers shouting at villagers. Insurgents appear, fighting starts. There is an explosion. Then everything stops and we find we are not in Iraq, but are on a US Army base in California called The Box in 2006 and this is a training exercise for soldiers about to deploy to Iraq. The villagers and insurgents are mainly Hollywood actors playing roles in this romantic comedy called Atropia. One of the actors is Fayruz (Alia Shawkat of Arrested Development and Search Party), who wants to get movie roles in Hollywood and schemes to find ways to get noticed. She learns of a famous Hollywood actor who is going to observe the exercises and believes this is her big chance. The head insurgent, Abu Dice (Callum Turner (The Boys in the Boat)) becomes suspicious leading to a confrontation and therefore the romance between the two. There is plenty of room for comedy in a movie about military training. (Remember Stripes and Private Benjamin?) Atropia delivers with bumbling officers and soldiers, misunderstandings when things go wrong and plenty of suggestive comments toward a female mock news reporter (Jane Levy of Zoey’s Extraordinary Playlist). It is mainly the two leads that carry the movie, especially Shawkat who delivers one of her best performances yet. Her ethnicity is Iraqi so she fits right into the part. She should have more starring roles given her comedic talent. The director/screenwriter, Hailey Gates has done well, given that this is her first effort at directing a feature movie. The movie was developed from a short done several years ago by the team of Gates and Shawkat. At the end a screen graphic tells us that there are hundreds of training sites like the one portrayed. Only now the enemy combatants are Russians. The theater was packed for this one, but unfortunately none of the filmmakers were present for Q & A.

The Six Triple Eight

The Six Triple Eight          2 ½ stars

The Six Triple Eight tells the important true story of the 6888th battalion, the only Women’s Army Corps unit of color to serve overseas in World War II. This group of women were tasked with sorting through 17 million pieces of mail that needed to be delivered both to the American troops serving in Europe and to their families back home. Others before them had tried and failed at this enormous task, leaving millions without word from their loved ones. Besides having to find ways of accomplishing this monumental job with less than adequate facilities, they had to endure countless episodes of racism and sexism heaped on them by white men in the army and in the press. Tyler Perry, the writer/director, tells the story in his dramatic fashion, but all too often makes his characters appear as stereotypes without enough development. He certainly has a talented cast to work with that includes Kerry Washington, Susan Sarandon, Oprah Winfrey, Sam Waterston and Ebony Obsidian (Sistas). Except for Kerry Washington (Scandal) as Major Charity Adams, the characters seem two dimensional or just there as cameos in the cases of Sarandon, Waterston and Winfrey. Washington portrays the strength and determination of Adams well as she yells commands to her troops and deals with individuals on a personal level, all the while having to stand up to the racism exhibited by white American officers. Having seen so many examples of racist behavior in movies portraying the fifties and earlier, these seemed very stereotypical and comical, such as black soldiers being called lazy and stupid over minor matters. Of course, one cannot miss the degrading of people of color brought about by segregation of the period, something made clear in the movie. It took far too long I thought to get to the point of the movie as first we had to go through the love story of one of the women soldiers played by Ebony Obsidian as Lena Derriecott, whose Jewish boyfriend is sent to Europe and is killed in battle early in his service. (I didn’t need to see him talking to her from beyond the grave.) Too much time passes before the importance of an air force pilot being killed in an early scene is finally revealed. We also must go through Lena’s relationship with a black soldier serving in Europe. More interesting to me were the scenes where the soldiers endure the hardships of their treatment and despite this, manage to find inventive ways to track down the identities of thousands of US servicemen when many of the pieces of mail seem to be indecipherable. And even though they are well behind enemy lines they must endure the threat of air attacks from the enemy. I have only seen a handful of Tyler Perry’s numerous projects (that doesn’t include a single Madea movie) and this one is too highly melodramatic as is his style, based on what I have seen. At the end of the movie, we are rewarded with actual footage of the army unit and its commander, Major Adams. The movie was released just in time to be eligible for the Academy Award nominations. We will see what materializes from it. The Six Triple Eight is available on Netflix.

Three Minutes – A Lengthening

Three Minutes – A Lengthening 5 suns

This short documentary about a three minute section of color movie film is one of the most fascinating documentaries I have seen. A few years ago writer Glenn Kurtz found a home movie filmed by his grandfather, David Kurtz in 1938 for a vacation to Europe. Among the places he visited was Nasielsk, Poland, a predominantly Jewish village north of Warsaw that was David’s birthplace. The three minutes of film shows the faces of well over 100 people, all Jewish, who were in the street, many of them fascinated by the American who was using his new camera to film them. Of course the tragic thing is that only a year later the Nazis would come to the town and force all the Jewish residents onto the trains taking them to the concentration camps. Only about 100 people from the village would survive through the war. The filmmaker takes us through the extraordinary efforts to find the places and names of the people in this short section of home movie, leading in directions that would find some individuals still living. There are stories even about the fabrics worn by the women and the buttons of coats originating from a nearby factory. The writing has a poetic aspect to it as we realize we feel so close to these people through the pictures, but that the once thriving community was to be lost in such a short time.

Klondike


KLONDIKE           5 suns

My personal winner for the day was KLONDIKE. It’s a fictional story about a Ukrainian couple who live in an isolated farmhouse in Eastern Ukraine, but it is set in 2014 during the war of Russian incursion when a Malaysian airliner is brought down by a Russian missile. News footage from the actual events give us more background to the story. Tolik and Irka are expecting a child, but their world faces havoc when this war is brought to their doorstep. Tolik struggles to deal with the damage to their home, the soldiers who demand that their needs be met and a wife who refuses to leave her home. Things are further complicated when Irka’s brother shows up and we find that the family has sympathies on opposite sides of the conflict. The camera work is striking with the very long scenes that slowly reveal the horrors of war in the background while the characters are struggling just to survive. The film is highly relevant to today with its message about the futility of war. It deserves some special recognition.

All Quiet on the Western Front

All Quiet on the Western Front  4 ½ stars

This time I went from the horrors of narcissistic billionaires to an even greater horror, the viscousness of all-out war, by viewing the 2022 film, All Quiet on the Western Front. This is the German language film based on the well-known novel of the same name by Erich Maria Remarque. The book was made into the Academy Award winning film in 1930, and now we have the latest version, made with all the special effects of the present day. The film, by director Edward Berger, holds nothing back in presenting how horrible and devastating war can be. (I also happened to take a guided tour of World War I battlefield sites in France around this time so got a first-hand view of some authentic locations where The Great War was fought.) The opening scenes focus on a World War I battle between the Germans and the French showing us what trench warfare was like, with the soldiers seeing their comrades killed in an instant. But then we see the aftermath, with the bodies being gathered for burial as well as the gathering of the uniforms of the dead. The film then follows the path of the uniforms showing how they are cleaned and then mended so they can be reused by the next group of soldiers, giving us the feeling of a never-ending cycle of death. Like the book we follow teenage recruit Paul and his friends who are very enthusiastic about joining the army and the glory that awaits them. They are assured that the war will be over soon, and they will return to their homes as heroes. Of course, this is not to be as we are treated to one scene of horror after another showing the effects of modern weapons of war. Often the assaults result in scenes of hand-to-hand combat between the adversaries but based on my tour and readings, actual hand to hand combat was a rarity in World War I. More common were the artillery bombardments resulting in large casualties followed up with infantry attacks causing the enemy to retreat from their trenches. In this respect the movie and book are not accurate. We are also treated to scenes of comradery among Paul and his fellow soldiers during the quieter times in the trenches and the surrounding countryside. Against these scenes are those showing what life is like for the higher brass who issue the commands sending thousands of men to their deaths. These well-fed men with their large mustaches feast on their wine and cheese seemingly without a thought of concern for what the men are going through. They are only concerned about their own glory by achieving the victory in battle that forever eludes them. The frightening scenes of battle are backed up by an unsettling score and some of the best cinematography I have seen. The movie was the recipient of four Academy Awards which are well deserved. If you are at all interested in anti-war films, All Quiet on the Western Front must be on your list.

The Catcher Was a Spy

The Catcher Was a Spy   3 stars

The Catcher Was a Spy takes us back to the espionage days of World War II when men in trench coats and fedora hats met secretly at night to gather intelligence and plan strategic assassinations. Here director Ben Lewin tells the true story of professional baseball player Moses “Moe” Berg who volunteered for the OSS and was sent on a mission to find and assassinate nuclear physicist Werner Heisenberg who may or may not be working on a German atomic bomb. The usually comedic Paul Rudd steps into the dramatic role of Berg and does a decent job given the material. I wanted to like the movie more but there wasn’t enough to get excited about though the combination of sports hero, wartime intrigue and harrowing situations would seem to provide plenty of material. Berg is an interesting subject, given the facts that he was Jewish, studied at universities, spoke several foreign languages and was sometimes perceived as being gay. We don’t get a full picture of Berg and his motives making him a mysterious figure which may be a good thing for the movie. With hindsight we now know that Germany was not close to producing an atomic weapon though it was feared they might be. So perhaps the premise of tracking down a scientist who could be working on such a weapon during a war is not that interesting of a story after all despite the background of the baseball player turned spy. That’s just a thought.

Quo Vadis, Aida?

Quo Vadis, Aida?              4 ½ stars

Quo Vadis, Aida? from 2021 is a movie that should be seen when the viewer is in the frame of mind to accept a truly tragic situation. The movie by Jasmila Zbanic is based on the true story of what happened at the village of Srebenica, Bosnia during the war there in 1995. This is where one of the greatest war crimes in Europe was committed with the murder of thousands of innocent Bosnian men by the Serbian army. The film is told mainly from the point of view of Aida, a middle-aged Bosnian woman employed by the United Nations as an interpreter. This provides her with insight and access to what is going on at the UN base camp where thousands of Bosnian refugees are seeking protection after being driven out of their homes. As this tragedy unfolds she is also trying to see that her husband and two sons do not fall into the hands of the soldiers. The film shows us the senselessness of war in general and the complete ineffectiveness of the UN to prevent an atrocity due to failure of policy and of bureaucracy. We see how the nightmare unfolds step by step as Aida tries to work with the UN officials to find a way to protect her family and is met by resistance from the authority figures. The UN officers are not solely to blame as they are restricted by the orders from their superiors and so are prevented from following through on their promises to protect the local population. The film plainly tells how this atrocity happens and its effect from a personal point of view. The viewer should go into the film knowing there will be nothing pleasant about the ultimate outcome, though there are few scenes of direct violence shown on screen.

20 Days in Mariupol

20 Days in Mariupol,  5 stars

20 Days in Mariupol has to be one of the most compelling and important movies to show here at the festival. Before Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, Ukranian war correspondent and filmmaker Mstyslav Chernov took a team of journalists into the eastern Ukrainian port city of Mariupol. Then the war started with the city receiving incessant shelling and bombing against the military and civilians alike.  Chernov’s team recorded as much as they could spending much of the time in the hospitals where they show us the many casualties of the conflict that included women, children and the elderly. They show how the Russians targeted infrastructure to remove electricity and heat from the population.  The journalists sometimes have to travel around to find an internet signal so they could get their material to the Associated Press and the world. We are not spared seeing many atrocities caused by the shelling including children dying on the operating table.  An estimated 25,000 people were killed in the city and suburbs.  Many of the images are familiar as they were seen worldwide in the early days of the war. The film gives a wider perspective too by showing the propaganda war waged by the Russians that seeks to discredit the truth.  In the footage we even see civilians who are convinced that they are being attacked by the Ukranian military. The entire movie is narrated by Chernov who was also present at the Q&A where he expressed how important it is show the truth about the war. 

Napoleon

Napoleon            1 ½ stars

The long-anticipated Ridley Scott epic Napoleon about the man who sought to conquer all of Europe appeared in theaters on November 22 and I was there for the first day. It combines my interest in movies and military history so it was a must see. Joaquin Phoenix (of Walk the Line and Gladiator) portrays the emperor from his rise to power from an artillery officer to claim the throne through a coup, to his ultimate demise and exile from France. We also get a big dose of his love life with his wife, Josephine, taking up way too much of the film. The movie can be described as a spectacle of grand scale battle scenes, grandiose balls with aristocrats decked out in their finest and comical love scenes between the horny Napoleon and the standoffish Josephine. One would expect it to be a difficult task to cover such an expanse of history in a two and a half-hour film, but Scott’s version of it is especially hard to follow to the point of being laughable. There is little to connect the scenes as we pass through the events of history. During the revolution there is a representation of Robespierre, but we don’t really see what he is about or why he was so powerful. A few Marshals of the French army are there, such as Junot, Ney and Berthier, but they are just characters in the background with Napoleon barely interacting with them. During the movie there are scenes depicting the battles of Toulon, Austerlitz, Borodino and Waterloo with great looking clashes of soldiers and cavalry charges, but we never get much explanation of why they are being fought. There is no mention of the peninsula war, very little about the Prussians, a major participant in the wars, or of any naval actions. After the burning of Moscow in 1812, we immediately go to Napoleon’s ouster from being emperor ignoring the two years of the war in Prussia. In much of the movie we see a very petulant Napoleon who is all about settling scores with other heads of state, but none of his genius in his vision of a united Europe. In the battle scenes themselves there is nothing to show the tactics of warfare of the time, not to mention all the historical inaccuracies. The British were not entrenched at Waterloo like the movie shows us and there is nothing to show how the British defended farm buildings or used slopes of hills to their advantage. In one scene, Napoleon points to Waterloo on a map saying that is where he will defeat the enemy. (Nevermind that it is the defender that chooses the site of battle, not the attacker.) The funniest line is when Napoleon rages against the British saying “You think you’re so great just because you have boats!”. I had to laugh. Also ridiculous were the sex scenes between the emperor and Josephine making them appear like animals in the act. I would have to say that they did a good job with the uniforms of the soldiers and the weapons of the time. The firing of the artillery and the effects on people and horses did look realistic. But the movie was not worth two and a half hours of my time and I am sure there are much better dramatic works available about Napoleon and the wars in Europe of this period. I don’t know what came over Ridley Scott to create this mess.