Category Archives: 2019

Little Women

Little Women                    4 ½ stars

Greta Gerwig, the writer/director behind Lady Bird brings us her take on Louisa May Alcott’s classic Civil War era novel Little Women.  In her version, the tale of the four March sisters is blended with Alcott’s struggle to be a successful author placing older sister Jo, (played by Saoirse Ronan) as the creative writer of Little Women.  Another difference from earlier movies, of which there may be as many as seven, she puts the timelines in parallel showing us the older siblings trials alongside scenes of the girls living together in their family home with their mother (a good natured Laura Dern).  And it is done using the same actors in both settings where previous versions have used younger actors to portray the teenage sisters.  They may not all look like teenagers, but I thought the approach worked well especially with how active and energetic the actors are.  The movie shares the aspect of the earlier films that shows how dependent women were on finding a good husband in order to succeed in life.  Of special note is the role of Amy (Florence Pugh) as Gerwig makes it clear that she is the obstinate and ambitious one, as she is seen maturing the most of the sisters and the one who ends up with the boy next door, Laurie played by Timothee Chalamet.  The film is rather long but I find I didn’t really notice it all that much as the scenes seem to fly by at a fast pace keeping us engaged the whole time.  Gerwig is said to have read the book Little Women multiple times growing up and it is clear that she gave it her best effort as a writer/director.  Be sure you see it.  It is bound to earn a few Academy Award nominations.

1917

1917                       5 stars

1917 is a war movie that features no great battles of armies and no grand strategies of generals.  Yet it succeeds in conveying the horrors of war and the dangers of being a soldier in one of the greatest conflicts in human history.  Sam Mendes tells us the story of two British Lance Corporals who are sent on a mission to deliver a message to the commander of a British force that is about to launch an attack into what is described as a trap set by the German army.  This force is otherwise cutoff from communication in the days before wireless radios, so these two must venture through No Man’s Land in daylight to deliver the critical message.  Mendes, through the miracle of today’s special effects and tiny mobile cameras manages to film the scenes with an absolute minimum of cuts.  The result is a feeling that the audience is right there with the soldiers as one horror after another unfolds before them.  In addition the effect is aided by a superb score from Thomas Newman that captures the feeling of dread in No Man’s Land and the fast pace of the action sequences when the enemy is confronted.  The sets are just as I imagine what World War I looked like including the dead soldier’s bodies peering from the mud and the contrast of the construction of British trenches vs. German trenches.  Mendes used two unknown actors in the parts of the Corporals in order not to distract from the film’s focus.  The two young men are very effective in their roles so he made a good choice.  There are some well-known actors in supporting roles including Colin Firth and Benedict Cumberbatch as commanding officers who perform well.  I had been rooting for Quentin Tarantino’s “Once Upon a Time in Hollywood“ to win the Academy Award for Best Picture, but now I will have to go with 1917.  I find it even more compelling than Dunkirk from a couple of years ago.

Yesterday

Yesterday            3 stars

Recently we have been getting a string of movies that honor musicians of the past.  See Bohemian Rhapsody, Rocketman and Blinded by the Light.  Last year’s Yesterday was Danny Boyle’s tribute to the music of The Beatles which imagines what it would be like if the legendary British rock group never existed.  In this movie an alternate timeline suddenly appears where nobody remembers The Beatles except for one struggling British musician, Jack.  After a mysterious bus accident when the lights go out all over the world, Jack discovers that he is the only one who can remember the band’s songs.  Thus, he has moved into an alternate timeline where not only the Beatles, but also Coke and cigarettes do not exist.  Jack is so obsessed with remembering and recreating the songs that after singing them he goes a step further and claims that he actually the songs himself, a move that brings him wide acclaim and fame.  He even gets the aid of singer/songwriter Ed Sheeran who appears as himself.  In the end though the thing that is most important to Jack is his manager, Ellie, who he has known since childhood.  Thus, the movie becomes more of a romantic comedy than an exploration of what made the Beatles so great.  There is really no exploration of the group or the times that their music was born in.  I understand that the original script was more about the occurrence of the alternate timeline and less of a romantic comedy.  I can’t help but wonder what an interesting movie that would have been.  Nevertheless, it was very entertaining to hear many of the Fab Four’s great hits again.

Just Mercy

Just Mercy                          4 stars

Just Mercy, written and directed by Destin Daniel Cretton is mainly a legal drama about a young lawyer, Bryan Stevenson (Michael B. Jordan) from the East coast who has taken a case to free a wrongly convicted black man of a brutal murder in rural Alabama in the early nineties.  Walter McMillian (a superb Jamie Foxx) is a private logger who was sentenced to death for the killing of a white teenage girl based solely on the unsubstantiated testimony of a convicted felon who was pressured into identifying McMillian as the killer by a corrupt local sheriff.  There was no physical evidence linking him to the crime.  The film is based on a true story about an attorney who is still active today fighting for unjustly convicted, mostly black prisoners.  It is the type of story we have seen frequently from Hollywood, but is aided by the quiet reflective scenes involving Foxx who just wants his previous life with his family back.  The villains of the story are the usual corrupt district attorney and sheriff who care more about their own records than about justice for the citizens.  The movie is a long one at 136 minutes, but the viewer stays involved due to the performances of the three main actors, Jordan, Foxx and Brie Larson as Bryan’s support advocate.  The movie clearly portrays the prejudices against black men that tear communities apart.  Despite the fact that it has been nearly thirty years since the events in the movie took place, many of these same problems are still with us today.  At the end of the movie, the postscript tells us that prisoners on death row are proved innocent at a rate of one out of nine, clearly an intolerable situation.  Please try to see Just Mercy when you get a chance.

Hustlers

Hustlers                               4 stars

Hustlers stars Constance Wu and Jennifer Lopez as strip club dancers who come up with a scheme to get even with their rich clients and former employers who have been taking advantage of them for years.  It stars Jennifer Lopez as an exotic dancer is probably the best role of her career.  What is there not to like about that?  How did Jennifer not get an Oscar nomination for this?

Ad Astra

Ad Astra                               4 stars

Ad Astra is last year’s emotional and grand science fiction movie that starred Brad Pitt as an astronaut sent on a mission to make contact with a rogue astronaut who is threatening the solar system.  It is a quiet contemplative film while also containing moments of intense action.  Past movies it has been compared to include Apocalypse Now and 2001: A Space Odyssey.  It opens with a thrilling scene where astronaut Roy McBride (Pitt) is helping in the construction of an enormous space antenna when disaster strikes sending him hurtling toward earth.  Later, he learns that a series of electrical disruptions may be due to a lost space mission sent to Neptune twenty years earlier that was commended by Roy’s father, Clifford (Tommy Lee Jones).  The Space Command has decided that Roy is the best suited to try to make contact with the rogue mission.  The movie has a realistic feel to it and the events in space seem to be plausible.  Private interests seem to have taken hold on the moon that even leads to space pirates with raiding parties!  The movie really succeeds with the quiet performance of Pitt aided by a fine Tommy Lee Jones.  There is also a small role for Donald Sutherland that is carried off well.  So, see Ad Astra for the role that Brad Pitt was not nominated for.

The Irishman

The Irishman                      5 stars

Much has been written about Martin Scorsese’s newest gangster movie, The Irishman, about the relationship between Teamster union president, Jimmy Hoffa (Al Pacino) and mobster hitman Frank Sheeran (Robert De Niro).  It is quite a masterpiece and at nearly three and a half hours in length, a challenge to last through in a single sitting.  There are plenty of brutal murder scenes as one would expect in a mobster movie and strained relationships between family members especially the women involved.  The special language used by the gangsters is always present as the characters have a certain way with words that sanitizes their true intent.  We hear Frank talk about how he is sorry about his life when we all know he doesn’t really mean it.  The movie was especially expensive to make which is partially due to the special effects used to “deage” the main characters to allow us to see them over a span of fifty plus years.  Never before have we seen what aging mobsters are like. (Since they typically don’t live to see their later years.)  Here we see Frank in a nursing home after all his associates are long gone and his family will no longer see him.  I especially want to take note of the performance of Joe Pesci as Russell Bufalino, the Italian mob boss in an understated role different from how we are accustomed to seeing him.  He deserves his Academy Award nomination.  The film earned ten nominations altogether and deserves its standing as one of the best films of the year.

One Child Nation

One Child Nation                              4 ½ stars

One Child Nation is a documentary about a subject we have all heard something about but that very few of us know the whole story.  The filmmaker, Nanfu Wang tells us in very personal terms about China’s policy of allowing families to have only a single child in the name of improving the productivity of the country.  This policy, that lasted from 1979 until 2015 was responsible for many thousands of forced abortions, sterilizations, infanticide and government abductions of children from their parents.  The film was thoroughly researched and tells the story through many personal interviews with those who were forced to carry out the government policy and with those directly affected by it.  Wang was personally affected by it as she was born in China during the policy and had a younger brother who might have been lost if he had turned out to be a girl.  Wang herself has a boy’s name because her family was hoping for a boy, which is the much preferred gender to have as children.  In the nineties when international adoptions opened up in China, the government started the practice of forcing children to be separated from their parents and placed in orphanages where they could then be allowed to be adopted by western parents.  The film is an important one to see as it shows what an authoritarian government can be capable of.  This is the second documentary from Wang who was only in her early thirties when it was made.  Her films which were filmed in China has brought her unwelcome attention from the Chinese government.  The interviews are done in Chinese, but her narration is all done in English.  Let’s hope that she continues her good work in the future.

Marriage Story

Marriage Story                  4 ½ stars

Marriage Story, written and directed by Noah Baumbach is probably his best work to date.  That is saying a lot as I have previously enjoyed Mistress America, While We’re Young, Frances Ha and Greenberg among others.  Unlike those earlier comedies this one is strictly drama as it tells us about a marriage that is coming apart.  It accurately shows the pain and emotion that comes with the impending divorce of Charlie and Nicole (played by Adam Driver and Scarlett Johansson).  The pair have decided to divorce but haven’t worked out the details when actress Nicole moves from New York to Los Angeles with the couple’s son, Henry, leaving Charlie a successful play director to work with his theater group in New York.  Things become serious when Nicole hires divorce lawyer Nora (Laura Dern) and she asks for full custody of their son.  The writing of the dialogue is first rate which coupled with convincing performances from the three main actors makes the discussions and conflicts all seem real.  You will feel the pain coming through as the couple go from loving each other to resentment and distrust.  Laura Dern especially is excellent showing that she deserves the Academy Award for her acting.  You won’t be laughing through this movie, but will be gripped by the performances.  If you are more interested in comedies though, you should check out Baumbach’s earlier screenwriting efforts.

Portrait of a Lady on Fire

Portrait of a Lady on Fire               4 ½ stars

Portrait de la Jeune Fille en Feu or Portrait of a Lady on Fire is a complex love story with only female characters set in eighteenth century France that is certainly very difficult to describe.  A young painter, Marianne is commissioned to paint a portrait of a noblewoman’s daughter (Heloise) who has spent her adult life in a convent and is to be married to a Milanese suitor.  The problem is Heloise is to think that Marianne is there as a companion and is not to know that her real purpose is to paint a portrait.  Thus, the painter has to do the painting in secret without the benefit of a posed subject.  The relationship between the two young women changes and grows throughout the slowly developing plot as we learn more about Heloise.  How she wants to enjoy her freedom and is less than enthused about her planned marriage, about the suicide of her sister and the failed attempt at a portrait by a previous painter.  It is a well put together love story about a slowly growing attraction between the characters and a resentment of the circumstances of their lives.  The story is told with very few characters and a minimum of dialogue.  An additional feature is how the film shows just how difficult it is for a painter to create a painting, something I don’t remember seeing before.  For those who love period romances, Portrait of a Lady on Fire is highly recommended.