Author Archives: Ron

About Ron

I like to watch movies and share my thoughts on them. I have been writing reviews and distributing them since 2013.

The Hand of God

The Hand of God              4 ½ stars

Academy Award winning Italian director Paolo Sorrentino creates a Fabelman-esque story in The Hand of God, a sort of coming of age story loosely based on his own upbringing in 1980’s Naples. If you have seen one of his previous movies, The Great Beauty, you know he has set some high standards. In The Hand of God, we follow 18-year-old Fabietto (Filippo Scotti) who lives with his mom and dad and spends his time going to large family gatherings, going with his brother Marchino to acting auditions and dreaming about sex and soccer (European football), though it’s hard to tell which interests him more. He also has an interest in the movies. The early scenes are amusing in this two hour and ten minute movie, such as when his aunt Patrizia takes the opportunity at a family outing to sunbath nude in the presence of the entire family. Other relatives create equally absurd situations. A central element of the film comes when real life Argentinian superstar Diego Maradona joins the Naples soccer team creating a sensation for young Fabietto and the whole city. It is when a great tragedy strikes that forces the young man toward making decisions about what he should do with his life and is steered toward filmmaking. The Hand of God is largely fictionalized, but it does mirror events from Sorrentino’s life including the life changing tragedy. (The meeting with film legend Frederico Fellini did not actually happen though.) It’s worth viewing provided you can commit for the full duration. The Hand of God was nominated for the Best Foreign Language Film Oscar.

Asteroid City

Asteroid City      4 stars

Viewers of Wes Anderson’s Asteroid City will immediately recognize the picturesque style and rapid storytelling techniques of the acclaimed director. This is apparently the eleventh film of Anderson’s going back to Bottle Rocket in the nineties. This one may be the most imaginative one yet. Here we get a story within a story as the film starts with a TV host in a 1950’s Actors’ Studio show telling us about the writing efforts of a famed playwright working on his play, Asteroid City. This part of the movie is in black and white, but when we travel to the play, set in a 1950’s southwestern town in the desert the screen switches to bright pastel colors so typical of Anderson’s movies. The town is the location of the annual Junior Stargazer/Space Cadet convention because it is the site of a crater created by an asteroid many centuries before. There, we see a large collection of interesting characters portrayed by many well-known Hollywood actors, including some regulars that Wes Anderson works with. They include Jason Schwartzman as a war photographer traveling with his Brainiac son, Scarlet Johansson as a Hollywood film star and Tom Hanks as a rich grandfather. Some of the actors have double roles portraying their Asteroid City characters and the actors in the play when they interact with the play’s director (Adrien Brody). There are too many notable characters for me to list here. You will have to see the movie to get the full experience. Eventually, there is a life changing event in the small town that brings the attention of the US military. We do get a fascinating story told with rapid fire dialogue and narration that’s familiar as was done in movies of the forties and fifties. You may experience some confusion about what’s going on as expressed by Schwartzman’s Jones Hall does when talking to the director, Schubert Green (Brody). His advice: “Don’t worry about it, just keep telling the story.” Wes Anderson’s movies aren’t always cohesive. They are more about being something to experience and Asteroid City is all about the experience.

Elemental

Elemental            3 ½ stars

The new Disney/Pixar animated movie Elemental takes on racism and the treatment of immigrants as well as the question of whether fire and water can coexist. In the much anticipated movie released in June, a couple from the foreign land of Firetown comes to Element City, a metropolis where the citizens are made up of the four elements: Earth, Wind, Fire and Water. They set up a shop in a rundown part of town and soon have a daughter named Ember, who grows up to be a young woman with a very fiery personality. It’s pretty clear that there are racist treatments toward the Fire citizens and that the Water inhabitants are the more privileged class in this modern land. Ember is destined to eventually run the shop, taking it over from Dad when he retires, but she has difficulty controlling a temper that can wreak havoc on the shop and the customers. When she causes a water leak in the basement, a Water city inspector named Wade appears who is overly sentimental and prone to crying spells. Wade threatens to report the shop over code violations, creating the necessary situation where Ember and Wade must work together to find the source of a water leak that endangers much of Element City. There is no bad guy here. It is just a case of decaying infrastructure, but it provides a way to show how the Fire citizens are treated and the excuse to get Ember and Wade together and find out if Fire and Water can exist together. There are some moments of great tension involving a sports arena and enthusiasm for a Wind athlete and one of his greatest fans, and then there are the inevitable meet the parents scenes. There are the usual comedic moments where we find a cute character. This time it is a young Earth kid named Clod who is destined to be a pest when he grows up. It is clear that the writers drew on some of their own experience as immigrants in developing the story, especially with the traditions from the old country and with the Fire people being excluded from certain events. The animation is first rate as expected with Pixar, but the story is a little thin in this one.

Sound of Freedom

Sound of Freedom          no review

I have not seen the Jim Caviezel movie Sound of Freedom, nor will I ever see it. The ads for it have been appearing regularly on television. The movie has had some very high box office numbers and has created a stir in the right-wing world so I felt compelled to make a public service announcement and warn people about it. The thriller action movie appears to be part of a crusade against child trafficking and features Caviezel as a sort of one man super hero out to rescue the victims of the sex trade. (Caviezel is best known for his portrayal of Jesus Christ in the Mel Gibson movie The Passion of the Christ.) In reality, it is a propaganda piece put out by the people who adhere to QAnon fantasy conspiracy theories such as the traffickers are harvesting children’s organs and extracting adrenochrome before killing them. The movie appears to be appealing to a mostly older white audience who are there to reinforce their views of what is wrong with the government and the country. Based on what I have read of the movie it is full of implausibilities and condemnations of the government. The movie was reportedly made in 2018 and it took this long to find someone to distribute it as it was considered to be a money loser. I have a suspicion that certain churches and right-wing groups have been buying out theater tickets in order to inflate the numbers. This has been a practice for other such propaganda movies. If you have not seen the movie you are warned to stay away from it. If you have seen it then you have my sympathy for enduring the pain.

Mission: Impossible – Dead Reckoning, Part One

Mission: Impossible – Dead Reckoning, Part One  4 ½ stars

Returning to the screen in true summer blockbuster form is the seventh Mission Impossible installment in Mission Impossible – Dead Reckoning, Part One. The awkward sounding name teams up Tom Cruise in his iconic role of Ethan Hunt, leader of the IMF team with director Christopher McQuarrie, who directed earlier MI films and last year’s big hit Top Gun: Maverick. The action thriller features no less than a car chase through a European city (featuring a miniature Fiat), a desert gun battle, a thrilling cat and mouse hunt through an airport with a possible explosive, daring hand to hand combat amid the canals of Venice, all capped off with a thrilling confrontation on the orient Express through the Austrian Alps. As usual, these action scenes feature Cruise doing most of his own stunts which includes jumping off a mountain peak on a motorcycle with a parachute. This time around Hunt has accepted a mission with his IMF team to stop The Entity, a digital sentient AI being that threatens to control the world. I hope this is very far-fetched. The key to stopping it is a literal key, the possessor of which could control the entity if they can get the key to the right place. This is all that is needed to set up the usual action sequences vital to a successful Mission Impossible film. Despite the name of the film, it really does stand on its own as a complete film. We are promised a Part Two coming next year which is rumored to be Cruise’s final entry of the franchise. Returning as part of Hunt’s IMF team are Luther (Ving Rhames), Benji (Simon Pegg) and Ilsa Faust (Rebecca Ferguson) who Hunt considers as family and perhaps his weakness. Villainous figures from the past appear including Gabriel (Esai Morales) and the White Widow (Vanessa Kirby) who vie for control of the Entity. One new character deserving attention is a pickpocket appearing at a very inopportune time in the form of Grace (Hayley Atwell) who is “persuaded” to join the IMF team when there is no other choice. The CIA suits who would like to control Hunt are portrayed by Henry Czerny as Kittridge, head of the CIA and Shea Whigham as Briggs, a government agent who seems to follow Hunt’s every movie. Rounding out the villains is Paris (Pom Klementieff) who is mostly silent but very well versed in car chases and hand to hand combat. (You may have seen her as Mantis in the Marvel movies.) The movie strikes the right balance between action sequences and cooled down scenes allowing the audience to catch its breath so that you don’t notice the two-and-three-quarter hour running time of the film. The AI themed plot of the movie is appropriate to our current times and one hopes it isn’t predictive of what is to become. Now I will be looking with anticipation to 2024’s release of Mission Impossible – Dead Reckoning, Part Two!

Lunana: A Yak in the Classroom

Lunana: A Yak in the Classroom  4 ½ stars

In an Academy Awards first, a movie from the mountainous country of Bhutan was nominated for an Academy Award in the Foreign Language category. Lunana: A Yak in the Classroom takes a familiar theme of a new teacher assigned to a class of poor students and gives it a new take, with a setting in the Asian village of Lunana, a real village in Bhutan that must be one of the most isolated spots in the world. Ugyen is a young man who is fulfilling his government contract as an elementary school teacher who really wants to move to Australia and perform as a singer. His boss remarks that he is the most unmotivated teacher she has ever seen so gives him the assignment to serve one term as teacher in the remote mountain village of Lunana where a post is available. Ugyen, who likes to listen to music on his iPod most of the time has no choice but to make the journey to Lunana, a trip of six days on foot through the mountains accompanied by two guides and three horses. When he finally arrives he is greeted by the village elder Asha who has great respect for teachers who “touch the future”, along with most of the village and the children who are to be his students. Lunana is without running water, has only solar panels for electricity and the main source of heat is burning yak dung because paper is too valuable to burn. Ugyen undergoes something of a transformation from thinking of teaching as an annoyance to seeing its value and having a sense of purpose when seeing the enthusiasm of the students even amid such conditions. He also learns more of the local culture by hearing the music dedicated to the life of a yak herder. The audience feels the transformation going on as Ugyen’s experience progresses. The movie’s premise may sound like a cliché, but it is moving especially since all of the cast has never acted before. The real life residents in the village had never even seen a car or a camera before. The movie’s film crew had to manage in the remote location for a three month shooting schedule as well as make the long journey on foot. I will leave it to you to discover what Ugyen decides to do at the end of the movie.

Coming 2 America

Coming 2 America            2 stars

It took thirty-three years for a sequel to be made of the Eddie Murphy/Arsenio Hall comedy Coming to America. The original movie was a hilarious fish out of water story about Prince Akeem, an African prince from the country of Zamunda who comes to Queens and meets Lisa (Shari Headley), his true love and brings her back home to share his life in the royal palace. This time around in Coming 2 America it is his illegitimate son, Lavelle (Jermaine Fowler) of Queens who must make the journey to Zamunda and assume his place in the royal family, something that seems like a dream come true at first. The hitch is that he has been promised as a mate to the daughter of the general (Wesley Snipes) from the neighboring country of Nexdoria in order to prevent the two countries from going to war. The main draw of the original movie is the many comedic moments involving Murphy and Hall which includes various other characters played by the pair thanks to the HEAVY use of makeup. This is especially true for the gang from the MY-T-SHARP barbershop in Queens. These old men appear again in the sequel but their roles don’t seem as significant, though they are very funny. There certainly are some very funny moments, but this movie just doesn’t measure up to the original which was the second most popular movie of 1988. I certainly do credit the appearance of Leslie Jones as Mary who is just as funny as I remember her from Saturday Night Live. There is also a great scene with Colin Jost appearing briefly as a racist hiring manager that I found quite hilarious. Somewhat distracting were the flashback scenes that made use of de-aging CGI to feature younger versions of the prince (Murphy) and his assistant, Semmi (Hall). I recommend that you see the original movie again and skip the sequel as it is a less funny imitation of the first film.

Oppenheimer

Oppenheimer   4 ½ stars

“Now I am become Death, the destroyer of worlds.” These are the words that J. Robert Oppenheimer, played by Cillian Murphy says early in the Christopher Nolan new epic film Oppenheimer about the life of the theoretical physicist who was chosen to head the Manhattan Project during World War II. We don’t know if Oppenheimer really said this but it demonstrates just how troubled he became as he would come to terms with the incredible destructive power unleashed with the atomic bomb. The film gives us the story of Oppenheimer’s life and how he led the project located in the desert at Los Alamos, New Mexico, including the scandal of an affair and the drama of two court hearings. The movie packs a heck of a lot in the three hour running time. It is about the creation of the bomb, but is just as much a tense political thriller. It follows multiple time lines and a myriad of characters from academics and the military using both color and black and white footage sometimes interspersed with images of explosions and rotting corpses and faces. Nolan often uses short scenes with only a few longer ones all of which are packed with dialogue jumping from one time to another. It would be nice to see the years the scenes occur in, but there are many clues given as the time lines stretch from the nineteen twenties to the nineteen fifties. Oppenheimer’s (Cillian Murphy) main enemy in the film is Lewis Strauss (Robert Downey Jr.), the chairman of the Atomic Energy Commission after the war who first recruits Oppenheimer then seeks to destroy his career. One may be surprised to see that the achievement of completing the first atomic explosion happens about two-thirds of the way through the film with the hearings taking up the remainder of the movie. In the first, occurring around 1954, Oppenheimer is accused of being an agent for the Soviets with communist leanings when it is brought out that his views toward the weapon changed with the development of the H-bomb and that his wife, Kitty (Emily Blunt) may have been a member of the Communist party many years before (the worst accusation in the America of the 1950’s). In the second, a Senate hearing is held for the confirmation of Strauss as the Commerce Secretary for President Eisenhower in 1959. We seem to go through endless testimony from individuals who played a role in the Manhattan Project, some on Oppenheimer’s side and some who are not. Throughout the entire movie, it is Murphy’s performance that makes it a success more than anything letting us see Oppenheimer’s talent as a visionary who is also deeply troubled by the threat brought to humankind by this creation. There are a great many actors with supporting roles in this complicated story that will be familiar to audiences. To mention a few there are Matt Damon, Josh Hartnett, Rami Malek, Kenneth Branagh, Casey Affleck, Florence Pugh and Jason Clarke without going into the individual roles. (Gary Oldman is great as Harry Truman being a real jerk.) To really understand what is going on, one would have to see the movie more than once. I can guarantee that it will keep your attention throughout, thanks to Nolan’s writing and an excellent score by Ludwig Goransson. I would say though that the sex scene in a hallucination that Oppenheimer has could have been left out and nothing would be lost. It is safe to say that this is one of two must see movies of the summer. We will be looking for many Academy Award nominations for Oppenheimer next year, I am sure.

Haunted Mansion

Haunted Mansion            2 stars

A number of years back Disney came up with the idea of making a movie based on a Disney ride and voila, Pirates of the Caribbean appeared on movie screens and became an instant success. Then just a couple of years ago Jungle Cruise came to the theaters and delighted many movie goers. Now we have the latest Disney release based on a Disney ride but this time you would be better off going to the park than to the theater. Haunted Mansion features a young woman named Gabbie (Rosario Dawson) and her nine-year-old son, Travis, who have taken possession of an old mansion that is over two hundred years old only to discover that it is inhabited by ghosts. She goes looking for help and finds a priest named Father Kent (Owen Wilson), a quantum physicist (LaKeith Stanfield) who has lost his wife, a medium (Tiffany Haddish) and a past his prime college professor (Danny Devito). None of the team can turn down the job because they all discover that once they enter the house, a ghost travels with them wherever they go, so they have to take on the challenge of removing the ghosts from the mansion. After many missteps involving spooky portraits and endless hallways with trap openings they eventually discover there is one ghost present who was a terrible man named Crump, (Jared Leto) who is collecting hundreds of souls in the house, tormenting them for eternity. With the help of a spirit trapped in a crystal ball (Jamie Lee Curtis) and a quest to find an artifact belonging to the horrible Crump some of the group leave on a venture to complete the challenge and rid the world of Crump. It’s quite a gathering of funny talented people that should make it an entertaining movie. The trouble is that it feels like a collection of poor CGI effects that make constant reference to the Disney ride and other past Disney movies. There are the obvious portraits with moving pictures, the descending floor, the guy playing the organ and the dancing spirits. There are even chairs that pick up characters and try to eject them from the property. It all feels like the movie makers are trying to inject everything they can find to mimic the ride. I had grown tired of the silly action by the time it was over. What a waste of comedic talent. I did find Hadish to be funny in her role as the medium and enjoyed seeing Jamie Lee Curtis if only briefly. Nice try Disney. Maybe you should make the movie first and then make the ride based on the movie. Another ghost movie called Ghostbusters comes to mind that I would gladly see again for more laughs.

Shotgun Wedding

Shotgun Wedding            1 ½ stars

I didn’t so much as watch Shotgun Wedding as endure it. Jennifer Lopez as Darcy does her latest performance in a wedding dress in this campy action comedy as a bride going to her wedding at a DIY destination event in the Philippines. Her fiancé, Tom (Josh Duhamel) has booked the location for its cost savings. Nevermind the fact that the location has a reputation for pirate attacks. When the pirates arrive, taking hostages and demanding ransom from Darcy’s father (Cheech Marin), Darcy and Tom somehow were missed and now must devise a plan to thwart the pirates and rescue their families and guests. Obviously zaniness ensues and all sorts of unlikely events happen highlighting the ineptitude of the pirates. It does turn out there is more to the crimes than what first appears and Tom is quick to see through the charade. One person who contributes well to the comedy is Jennifer Coolidge who always delivers with classy deadpan coolness. While watching this one I couldn’t help but feel this was another version of The Lost City (which also featured a dress but on Sandra Bullock), but a much less funny one. I usually see anything that features Ms. Lopez. This one was a lot more miss than hit.