Author Archives: Ron

About Ron

I like to watch movies and share my thoughts on them. I have been writing reviews and distributing them since 2013.

Werewolves Within

Werewolves Within                        3 ½ stars

For a smart blend of the comedy horror genre you won’t be disappointed by Werewolves Within from director Josh Ruben and writer Mishna Wolff. This is a whodunit much like Knives Out, except that the “who” might be an animal with razor sharp claws based on the condition of the victims. It all takes place in the tiny isolated town of Beaverfield in the Northeast that suffers a snowstorm, blocked roads and a power failure all at the same time. Add to that a mysterious murder of one of the residents and you have the terrifying situation the townsfolk are faced with. Among the trapped are two newcomers, Finn the forest ranger (played by Sam Richardson who many will remember as the nerdy but talkative Richard from Veep) and Cecily the postal employee (Milana Vayntrub, who everyone knows from the AT&T commercials). The other townsfolk are divided over the prospect of a gas pipeline being planned for the area that promises some economic development for the town. Much like the country they come down at opposite extremes over the plan. There is also a hermit living just outside the town who is suspicious of everyone and becomes a suspect after the murders start. The comedy really ensues when the locals all gather inside the town’s inn for safety and it becomes clear that one of them is the killer. Then the title really applies as the accusations start and they begin to kill off each other based on suspicion and conjecture. Much of the comedy is generated by the stereotypes that the characters embody. The final reveal and climatic ending almost doesn’t matter by the time we get to it. The real point has already been made. The last time I had more fun with a comedy horror movie was last year’s The Hunt followed by 2019’s The Dead Don’t Die.

Queen Bees

Queen Bees                       2 ½ stars

The newly released Queen Bees is a light likeable comedy for the older crowd staring Ellen Burstyn (of Alice Doesn’t Live Here Anymore) as Helen, an older widow who finds herself temporarily forced into an upscale retirement community called Pine Grove where there is plenty of company and activities for the aging residents. Among the widows there is a group of women who rule the community called the Queen Bees or as they say in the movie, they “are like mean girls with medical alert bracelets”. These “girls” are played by TV and movie legends Jane Curtin, Loretta Divine and Ann-Margret, quite a collection of talent. Helen is only here ”temporarily” and has to make the best of the situation, joining the ladies in the bridge club though things don’t go well at first. Any lightweight comedy has to have a love interest and this responsibility is filled by Dan, played by James Caan (of Godfather and Misery fame) an older gentleman who has recently moved into Pine Grove as well. Since Helen and Dan share an interest in flowers it becomes obvious where this is headed. The movie plays like many romantic comedies with friendships formed, tense moments, misunderstandings, the occasional tragedy and the expected happy resolutions. The movie is completely predictable, but with such a fine collection of older actors it is hard to see how things could go badly. There is even a young man who plays Helen’s perfect grandson who shares her interest in quotes by writers and is always looking out for her. Queen Bees is very appropriate for the grandmother crowd or a family outing to the movies.

Will & Harper

Will & Harper     4 ½ stars

Last year at Sundance a most unusual documentary premiered that was about two old friends reconnecting after losing touch after a few years. As I had heard about Will & Harper at the festival, I decided to go see this much talked about film in a theater. Here, one friends is “one of the greatest actors in the world” and the other is a comedy writer who has transitioned into the woman she had long thought she should be. The actor is Will Ferrell of SNL fame, (who is not one of my favorite comedians) and the writer is Harper Steele, who Ferrell met in 1995 during his first week on SNL and the two became close friends. Later, the two of them then worked together on multiple projects after leaving SNL. Upon being informed in an email of his friend’s decision and her new name, Ferrell suggested that the two of them take a road trip across America to some of her favorite spots and document it all by filming the whole trip, to which Steele agreed. They visit many dives and biker bars with Harper in women’s clothing and actually encounter many sympathetic people along the way. She does get misgendered a few times but that is corrected without incident. We meet some of Harper’s family and colleagues on the trip who are very supportive of her decision. They take in an Indiana Pacers game in Indianapolis and of course Ferrell is recognized. They even get the attention of Indiana Governor, Eric Holcomb, who asks them for a photo op after being introduced. We later see that he and many other politicians are behind anti-trans legislation enacted in many states throughout the country. Later, it is at a popular Texas steakhouse with Ferrell dressed up as Sherlock Holmes that they encounter real transphobia with many of those present posting insults about Steele on social media, making the scene uncomfortable for her. The real value of the film comes in the many quiet moments when this pair of friends engage in heartfelt conversation about what Harper went through in her life and how she came to the decision to transition. She shares how she knew something wasn’t quite right even as a child and on occasion had self-loathing thoughts. Sometimes, they even break down in tears in these scenes. You may wonder what the value is in making such a film. Is it just some publicity project for famous people? I think that it shows just what trans people go through in their lives and acknowledges them as real people defying how some deny their existence. I remember the movie being criticized in social media shortly after it appeared at Sundance. I can’t say that I understand the whole trans phenomenon, but certainly see the value in allowing their stories to be told. The movie is in theaters still and is available on Netflix.

I Carry You With Me

I Carry You with Me                        4 ½ stars

Established documentary film director Heidi Ewing (who I remember from her Oscar nominated documentary Jesus Camp) made her feature film debut with I Carry You with Me, a story that should not be missed. We get a unique treatment of two relevant issues in this movie about a young gay Mexican chef, Ivan (Armando Espitia) who meets and falls for Gerardo (Christian Vazquez), but faces a life of very limited opportunities in his home country; thus Ivan enters the U.S. illegally, finds his way to New York City where he finds life equally tough as an immigrant who speaks little English. The film is set in the nineties and shows the scorn gay men must endure in Mexico including from their own families. (Both Ivan and Gerardo are treated poorly as boys by their own fathers.) When Gerardo does finally join Ivan in New York, they must face the reality that their immigration status must prevent them from ever seeing their families again. The filming techniques used by Ewing with hand-held cameras gives us a very gritty feel of what life is like in these low income areas. The film is based on the real-life experiences of a renowned chef in New York, who is a restaurant owner, thus at about two-thirds of the way through, the movie transforms into documentary style as we follow Ivan (now about twenty years older) through his present day life that still includes Gerardo. It emphasizes how for these immigrants reaching the American dream includes a great deal of sacrifice that makes one question if it was all worth it. I Carry You with Me was featured at the 2020 Sundance Film Festival and received a Film Independent Spirit Award nomination for Best First Feature for Ewing earlier this year.

Judas and the Black Messiah

Judas and the Black Messiah                       5 stars

For many years I have heard the name Fred Hampton and the story of the Black Panthers but never really understood the importance of his name and what he stood for in late sixties Chicago. In Judas and the Black Messiah, Shaka King gives us his version of the story of the Black Panther Chicago chapter chairman and the FBI informant, Bill O’Neal and the ultimate murder of Hampton at the hands of the FBI and the Chicago police. Daniel Kaluuya (of Queen & Slim and Get Out) gives a career high star (and Oscar nominated) performance of Hampton with his speeches showing the rhetorical skills of the Black Panther leader and his vision of purpose of saving the downtrodden with the founding of the Rainbow Coalition. The events of the film take place only months after the Martin Luther King assassination and show that unlike King, Fred Hampton was not above seeking violence against the police. LaKeith Stanfield (of The Photograph and Sorry to Bother You) plays Bill O’Neal, who was only a teenager when the FBI picked him up impersonating an FBI agent and coerced him into joining the Black Panthers and becoming an informant on Hampton’s movements and actions. Stanfield, who also received an Oscar nomination for the film, brilliantly portrays O’Neal as the conflicted man who believes in the Panther cause while at the same time continuing with the FBI plan as he is forced by his FBI handler, Roy Mitchell (Jesse Plemons). The title describes the situation well as the Judas is torn by admiration and guilt while being completely helpless in freeing himself from his situation. The film gives us additional context by showing actual footage of the real O’Neal in his final 1989 interview telling of his action before he finally committed suicide. It is very illuminating that this film came out in the year following the George Floyd murder at the hands of police and the unrest that followed. It shows that some things have not really changed in fifty years. The film running time exceeds two hours and may be slow in sections, but I am very glad that it was made and that it is being seen by wide audiences.

Stillwater

Stillwater                             2 stars

Many of us remember the case of Amanda Knox, the young American woman who was held in an Italian prison for several years for the murder of her Italian roommate and was ultimately exonerated of the crime by an appeals court.  The movie Stillwater, written and directed by Tom McCarthy borrows heavily from that case, so much so that for a while I thought it really was about the case. Unfortunately, the movie only uses some elements of the Knox case, building instead a slow moving drama turned thriller about an Oklahoma father who travels to Marseilles, France to pursue a lead in the case against his daughter who has been serving a sentence for murder. The movie has outstanding performances by Matt Damon as the fish out of water American who looks more like Josh Brolin, Camille Cottin, the French mother who takes an interest in his predicament and offers her assistance, and Abigail Breslin as the imprisoned daughter. Eventually, the story takes an unlikely turn that stretches the viewer’s ability to believe the events on screen. I enjoy well written films about real life people that offer new insights into their circumstances and actions. And I enjoy thrillers that have original and unpredictable plots. This movie tries to be a blend of those two types of films and ultimately fails. I would understand how the real Amanda Knox would be very offended and frustrated by the release of this movie. Let’s hope that Tom McCarthy can return to movies like his previous successes Spotlight and The Station Agent.

The Six Triple Eight

The Six Triple Eight          2 ½ stars

The Six Triple Eight tells the important true story of the 6888th battalion, the only Women’s Army Corps unit of color to serve overseas in World War II. This group of women were tasked with sorting through 17 million pieces of mail that needed to be delivered both to the American troops serving in Europe and to their families back home. Others before them had tried and failed at this enormous task, leaving millions without word from their loved ones. Besides having to find ways of accomplishing this monumental job with less than adequate facilities, they had to endure countless episodes of racism and sexism heaped on them by white men in the army and in the press. Tyler Perry, the writer/director, tells the story in his dramatic fashion, but all too often makes his characters appear as stereotypes without enough development. He certainly has a talented cast to work with that includes Kerry Washington, Susan Sarandon, Oprah Winfrey, Sam Waterston and Ebony Obsidian (Sistas). Except for Kerry Washington (Scandal) as Major Charity Adams, the characters seem two dimensional or just there as cameos in the cases of Sarandon, Waterston and Winfrey. Washington portrays the strength and determination of Adams well as she yells commands to her troops and deals with individuals on a personal level, all the while having to stand up to the racism exhibited by white American officers. Having seen so many examples of racist behavior in movies portraying the fifties and earlier, these seemed very stereotypical and comical, such as black soldiers being called lazy and stupid over minor matters. Of course, one cannot miss the degrading of people of color brought about by segregation of the period, something made clear in the movie. It took far too long I thought to get to the point of the movie as first we had to go through the love story of one of the women soldiers played by Ebony Obsidian as Lena Derriecott, whose Jewish boyfriend is sent to Europe and is killed in battle early in his service. (I didn’t need to see him talking to her from beyond the grave.) Too much time passes before the importance of an air force pilot being killed in an early scene is finally revealed. We also must go through Lena’s relationship with a black soldier serving in Europe. More interesting to me were the scenes where the soldiers endure the hardships of their treatment and despite this, manage to find inventive ways to track down the identities of thousands of US servicemen when many of the pieces of mail seem to be indecipherable. And even though they are well behind enemy lines they must endure the threat of air attacks from the enemy. I have only seen a handful of Tyler Perry’s numerous projects (that doesn’t include a single Madea movie) and this one is too highly melodramatic as is his style, based on what I have seen. At the end of the movie, we are rewarded with actual footage of the army unit and its commander, Major Adams. The movie was released just in time to be eligible for the Academy Award nominations. We will see what materializes from it. The Six Triple Eight is available on Netflix.

Moana 2

Moana 2               3 ½ stars

It’s hard to believe that it has been eight years. That was when a young Polynesian woman, Moana went on an oceanic adventure across the Pacific with her demi-god friend, Maui on a mission to save her people in the hit animated Disney movie Moana. That was so long ago that Donald Trump was about to become President. Well, some things tend to repeat themselves. Now we find Moana (Hawaiian actress Auli’i Cravalho), having become a wayfinder is once more on a quest, this time to find signs of other island dwelling people and end her people’s isolation on the South Pacific Island of Matanui. Only, before leaving, Moana experiences a troubling vision telling her that long ago, a god like being called Nalo hid a secret island that had served to bring the island people together and that if things are not restored, it will mean the end of her people. For this journey she recruits a crew with her consisting of an elderly farmer, a sort of canoe design engineer, Loto and her large friend Moni who has a crush on Moana and likes to create images on canvases. After some preliminary adventures involving the coconut pirates, the Kakamora, the crew finds Maui (Dwayne Johnson) who is being held prisoner by a female god called Matangi (Awhimai Fraser). Once freed by Moana and the crew, they team up to accomplish the true mission, to find the lost island and set foot on it which will end the curse of Nalo. Before any of this can happen, we are treated to all sorts of action set to upbeat songs in the usual Disney fashion. Cravalho who plays Moana and is a Broadway actress really can belt out the songs, only the songs themselves are not quite so memorable. This movie does not use the song writing talents of Lin Manuel Miranda, like the original Moana did. While the characters are fun and amusing, the main villain seems to be the storm created by the evil god, who we don’t see much of. Much of the action centers on the characters saving one another from magic tornadoes and various creatures of the sea. Maui does his usual act of transforming into other creatures suited to each situation they encounter. The message here is that we benefit most by working together as a team. And naturally, the animation is top notch in the usual Disney fashion. I would not call it the best animated movie of the year, but you can’t miss by taking a young audience to see it. Judging by the box office, it is one of the major hits of the year.

Mulan

Mulan                4 stars

Disney gives its live treatment to another of their classic animated films in Mulan, with director Niko Caro of Whale Rider and The Zookeeper’s Wife, bringing us the story of Mulan, the young Chinese girl (played by Yifei Liu) who feels called to join the emperor’s army as a man to help fight off an invader determined to kill the emperor (a royal looking Jet Li). The story, based on a Chinese legend, is much the same as the 1998 animated movie but there are no musical numbers nor is there the small comical dragon, Mushu to provide comic relief. But we do get very colorful scenes showing Mulan’s village, the emperor’s palace and the natural expanse of China. There are plenty of action sequences featuring Mulan, the soldiers and the battles with the enemy and Bori Khan, the rebel leader (Jason Scott Lee). Khan is aided by a shape shifting sorceress (Gong Li) who can transform into an animal or impersonate another human with dire consequences. Since the movie is done with live actors it asks a lot of the viewer to believe that Mulan looks like a boy to the other characters, unlike the animated version. The strength of the movie is the story and the action sequences that are almost but not quite at the level of a Crouching Tiger Hidden Dragon. Liu’s acting also aids the personal moments of her character, though that is not the main focus of the movie. The violent battle scenes may make it not so suitable for very young viewers, but it is mostly bloodless battles that do leave quite a few casualties. Some of the soldiers of Mulan’s unit provide the comedic moments of the movie. I definitely liked the movie better than most of the audience reviewers seemed to. Some people must have wanted the musical animated version again. Mulan earned Academy Award nominations in Visual Effects and Costume Design. It was released during the height of the pandemic so it never got a theatrical release and could only be seen on streaming services. I recommend it for action fans and for fans of artistic movies.

Babygirl

Babygirl                4 stars

The newly released Babygirl starring Nicole Kidman (one of my favorite actresses) has to be one of the most sexually charged movies of the year. Written and directed by Dutch filmmaker, Halina Reijns (who previously brought us Bodies Bodies Bodies (where we enjoyed seeing Pete Davidson die!)), it features a May December relationship between Kidman’s Romy, the CEO of a major tech company and new intern, Samuel (Harris Dickinson), and raises the question of who controls who. Romy appears to have a happy home life with theater director husband Jacob (Antonio Banderas) and two teenage daughters, but we sense that something is missing when we see her watching porn. One day she spots a young man outside who is instantly able to calm down an aggressive dog. Then later she meets him in her office with a group of newly hired interns. He makes some rather odd and inappropriate comments which get Romy’s attention. Later, in a bar, he sends her a glass of milk which she immediately downs, suggesting that she is interested. This is only the beginning as the two secretly meet at Samuel’s urging, where he literally has her lapping milk from a saucer on the floor. Although very young, Samuel is an expert at manipulation through seemingly innocent comments and looks. You get the feeling that he has done this before. Romy objects to this arrangement and the way he treats her, only something makes us think that she doesn’t really mean it. Perhaps this is meeting the sexual satisfaction she is missing at home. The movie tackles the subject of sexual repression and puts a different spin on harassment in the workplace with the subordinate being the one who is exercising control over the boss. Kidman has led the way in portraying characters who have a certain vulnerability but lean toward the kinky. Remember Eyes Wide Shut and The Killing of a Sacred Deer! She displays a wide range of emotions from reluctance to confusion to anger to shame. The movie has a reasonable outcome to the whole situation without delving into stalker mode and only using a little violence. I was impressed but some movie goers might prefer the stalker route. The movie is bound to get some conversations going about control and consent and when do things go too far. Of course, the movie is another example of the wide acting talent of a great actress, Nicole Kidman.