Author Archives: Ron

About Ron

I like to watch movies and share my thoughts on them. I have been writing reviews and distributing them since 2013.

Death of a Unicorn

Death of a Unicorn          3 stars

Death of a Unicorn by first time director Alex Scharfman combines two genres of movies that I really like to see: the skewering of the rich and the comedy horror creature feature. So, if you think you might enjoy seeing some greedy ultra-rich bastards get what they deserve thanks to a murderous monster, this one could be for you. As is the case with most monster horror movies, there are some bad choices made by the characters that lead to unfortunate results for them. It features a few well-known stars and despite some unconvincing special effects, it is entertaining to watch. We meet lawyer Elliot (Paul Rudd of Ant-Man, Forgetting Sarah Marshall and Knocked Up) and his teenage daughter Ridley (Jenna Ortega of Wednesday) who are on their way to meet with his client, Odell Leopold (Richard E. Grant of Salt Burn) at their isolated mansion in the mountains, so that he can get him to sign a new contract. (Remember one of my first rules from the movies: If a billionaire invites you to their isolated mansion/compound, DO NOT accept!) Leopold and his family are major players in the Pharma industry and even have a live in security force and access to some top pharmaceutical researchers. On the drive to the mansion Elliot collides with an animal on the road that looks like a young horse like creature with a long horn on its forehead, injuring the animal. Not wanting to get caught by local authorities, Elliott bashes its head with a tire iron, spraying the animal’s blood all over poor Ridley and loads the dead animal into the back of the car. Later, during the meeting with Leopold (who is dying of cancer), his privileged wife (Tea Leoni of Tower Heist and Fun with Dick and Jane) and screw up son (Will Poulter of Midsommar and The Revenant) the unicorn in the car is discovered since it’s not really dead, so it is killed again. The group is fascinated by the fact that Ridley’s acne has cleared up after coming in contact with the creature’s blood. Naturally, the thing to do is to have the creature’s blood analyzed by Leopold’s scientists. They soon discover that it has mysterious healing powers so Leopold volunteers to consume some of the samples (as you do) and of course, his cancer is instantly cured! So, the greedy family must find a way to capitalize on this amazing discovery and make a ton of money. Ridley does some online research of her own and discovers some dangerous aspects of the legend of unicorns dating from the Middle Ages and tries to warn Leopold and family, but they aren’t willing to listen, since that would interfere with their plans to make more money. Things go predictably bad when Mama and Papa, two very large unicorns come looking for junior and aren’t at all pleased that these humans have killed him. What follows is a prolonged killing spree as the creatures hunt down their prey in quite violent and bloody fashion. Of course, most of the characters make one bad decision after another resulting in their being skewered and ripped apart by the pair of hooved parents. The animals are even smart enough to cut communication and power to the mansion. The writing for these ultra-rich idiots wasn’t the most convincing and the special effects creating the unicorns had a cheesy look to it. Better movies attacking the ultra-rich would be The Glass Onion and The Triangle of Sadness. For more entertaining comedy monster movies look for Werewolves Within, Shadow in the Cloud, The Dead Don’t Die and of course, the ever-popular Cocaine Bear. The movie is far from perfect but does provide a fun time for comedy horror fans. We will have to wait for a later attempt at combining attacks on the ultra-rich with a killer monster for something even better.

True History of the Kelly Gang

True History of the Kelly Gang                    4 stars

Although violent in the extreme, I recommend seeing this modern telling of the story of Ned Kelly, the Irish Catholic outlaw who terrorized Australia in the late 1800’s. George Mackay of 1917 plays the violent adult Ned to perfection as we follow his very troubled life running afoul of authorities (all British) in the Australian outback. The filming of a desolate landscape contributes to the bleak outlook that director Justin Kurzel wants to convey. The varied score that includes punk rock pieces gives the movie a surrealistic feeling. This is a violent, brutal and bloody film that will put many viewers off, but it is necessary to tell what life was like for the Irish lower class under British rule. The first part of the movie shows Ned Kelly as a young boy growing up dirt poor with a drunk Irish father and a foul mouthed mother (Essie Davis of Babadook). The young Ned has encounters with cruel individuals that will form his character including Sgt. O’Neil (Charlie Hunnan) and the thief Harry Power (Russell Crowe). Crowe’s time on screen is short so it is almost criminal that he gets top casting credit while the boy playing Kelly, who is on screen much longer is barely mentioned. Other notable actors playing scoundrels are Nicolas Hoult as a British cop who teasingly alternates between being Kelly’s friend and trying to bring him down, and Marlon Williams as George King, an American who seeks to take advantage of the poor Kelly family. Thomasin McKenzie of Lost Girls and Jojo Rabbit portrays Kelly’s love and mother of his daughter. Besides the violence, there is a theme of cross dressing as the Kelly gang wears flowing dresses while committing their crimes, a practice meant to instill fear in their victims apparently originating in Ireland. None of the characters have any redeeming features, all contributing to the lawless environment they find themselves in. The film has a very violent shootout scene to end on featuring strobe lighting and a seemingly endless supply of blood. This film is not for everyone, but a good one for lovers of Westerns. I strongly advise that you see the movie with closed captions as I find much of the Australian dialect is difficult to understand.

One Night in Miami

One Night in Miami                         5 stars

There has recently been an abundance of movies concerned with the civil rights era and/or racial injustice. One that should not be missed is One Night in Miami, written by Kemp Powers and directed by Regina King in her directorial debut. The movie takes a real event, the one night meeting of four legendary black figures in February of 1964 and imagines what transpired in the Miami motel, after Cassius Clay claimed the heavy weight boxing title at the age of 22. The four, black activist Malcolm X (Kingsley Ben-Adir), boxing champion Cassius Clay (to become Muhammed Ali) (Eli Goree), football star Jim Brown (Aldis Hodge) and singer/song writer Sam Cooke (Leslie Odom, Jr.) have gathered at the motel presumably to celebrate Clay’s unexpected win over Sonny Liston. Malcolm X though has brought the legends together for a private affair free of alcohol and women in order to challenge the men to take stronger action in the fight for racial justice in the 1960’s movement. Each of the men is at a pivotal point in their careers and must deal with their shortcomings and face what their role will be in the coming struggle. The script was adapted from the stage play also by Powers. Each of the four lead actors gives a commanding performance, especially Ben-Adir who shows Malcolm X’s doubts about breaking with the Nation of Islam and senses that something foreboding is coming. (He is to be assassinated only one year later.) One of the first scenes with Jim Brown visiting one of his “friendly” long time white neighbors played by Beau Bridges serves to remind us of what blacks in the south were facing at the time. Regina King said that the movie was still in production at the time of the George Floyd death, making the movie even more relevant to today. She wanted to get the film released as soon as possible. Look for One Night in Miami to receive several Academy Award nominations including Best Picture.

Bardo: False Chronicle of a Handful of Truths

Bardo: False Chronicle of a Handful of Truths       3 stars

This film by Mexican director Alejandro Gonzáles Iñárritu, with its long title is a very ambitious project in scope as well as being quite long at 159 minutes. It has some basis on his own life, which is a departure from his earlier award-winning films including Birdman and The Revenant. The main character, named Silverio (Daniel Giménez Cacho) is a renowned activist and filmmaker of documentaries from Mexico, who is about to accept an award in Los Angeles for his latest film. He has a troubled relationship with his family including his wife, grown daughter and teenage son. And he is haunted by the loss of an infant son years earlier, who in the film didn’t want to be born, preferring to stay in the womb. Yes, you read that right! Much of the film deviates from reality, taking on a surrealistic tone such as when Mexican soldiers from The Mexican War appear pretending to be fighting, a commuter train suddenly flooding with water or with Silverio meeting Spanish conquistador, Hernán Cortéz on top of a hill of human flesh. It’s all meant to show how Silverio is wracked with guilt. His time is split between two worlds, that of America where he is praised for his films and that of Mexico where he is from. Silverio both loves the beauty of Mexico and its people and hates it for its poverty and corruption. There are some people, including some of his own family, that despise him for this duality of his life. The film has some very artistic merits to it and has some masterfully done cinematography, especially when the camera does extremely long continuous takes gradually transitioning location and mood. The movie is grand in scale and Iñárritu has a lot to say, but it is probably a bit much for most audiences to take in. By the end of it I felt exhausted.

Pieces of a Woman

Pieces of a Woman                          3 stars

The title of Kornel Mundruczo’s Pieces of a Woman gives one the picture of a person being broken into pieces. This is truly the objective of the movie as we follow several months of Martha’s (Vanessa Kirby of The Crown) suffering after the loss of a baby daughter immediately after a difficult home birth. Sharing in the grief are her blue collar husband, Sean (Shia LaBeouf) and her elderly mother, Elizabeth (Ellen Burstyn). We see how each character deals with the loss differently and how it tears relationships apart. It is Kirby who gives a realistic performance of a woman broken by the experience, but then recovers from it on her own terms. For most of the movie I felt like I was watching people who were wallowing in self pity, who cannot feel empathy for the suffering of others. This is especially true of Sean, the working class husband who Elizabeth thinks is not good enough for her daughter. His reaction is one of rage as he fails to show up for work, has a brief affair and can’t find a way to cooperate in a sex scene with Martha. He is basically an ass, which makes it a perfect role for LaBeouf. Burstyn gives an excellent performance as the mother who is more concerned with making the midwife pay for the baby’s death than helping her daughter through the pain. The movie really belongs to Kirby who has been nominated for Best Actress by the Academy Awards for the role. The movie’s early scene showing the labor and delivery deserves a special mention as it is all done in a continuous take that lasts more than twenty minutes. The movie does have a courtroom scene about the lawsuit against the midwife, but it feels more like a subplot than the focus of the movie. For a better movie about the emotions of parents going through the loss of a child, I recommend Manchester by the Sea.

Mank

Mank                    4 ½ stars

Mank, now available on Netflix, is a rarity as it portrays 1930’s Hollywood while also being filmed in the style of the thirties. Directed by David Fincher (of The Social Network and Gone Girl), it stars Gary Oldman as Hollywood screenwriter Herman Mankiewicz who is best known for writing the screenplay of Orson Welles’ masterpiece Citizen Kane. The film is in black and white and looks much like the movies of the thirties, not only by the tones and shots on the screen, but also by the quick paced dialogue of that era. At the beginning we learn that in 1940 the young 24 year old phenomenon Orson Welles has been given free reign to make whatever movie he wants with whatever resources he needs. Welles has chosen Mankiewicz to write a screenplay about a corrupt media mogul who has even greater ambitions. Throughout the movie we see Mank confined to a bed following a car accident as he dictates to a secretary and receives visits from associates and occasional phone calls from Welles. The rest of the story is done in flash backs to Mankiewicz activities in the thirties where we really get a view of what old Hollywood was like, featuring such figures as Louis B. Mayer of MGM and an aging William Randolph Hearst, the ultrarich media mogul. Amanda Seyfried portrays Marion Davies, Hearst’s mistress and confidant of Mankiewicz. There is a good deal of social commentary on the politics of the age, so it helps to have some historical background. It is set in the midst of the depression at the beginning of the Roosevelt administration with labor strikes going on and with Hitler creating a stir in Europe. There is a socialist movement going on in California with writer Upton Sinclair challenging incumbent Republican Frank Merriam for the Governor’s office. The scene featuring a gathering of big wigs and socialites at Hearst castle engaged in a political discussion is fascinating as the socialist leaning Mankiewicz goes toe to toe with the Republican backers in the room. Much like Welles film, Mank can be viewed as an indictment of the superrich who live off the backs of the workers that keep their enterprise going. It is really Oldman who makes the film work though he is much older than Mankiewicz was at the time. Mank leads the Academy Award nominations with a total of ten, including Beast Actor for Oldman, Best Supporting Actress for Amanda Seyfried, Best Picture and Best Director for David Fincher. The screenplay was written by David Fincher’s father Jack who died in 2003 so never got to see it become reality.

Never Goin’ Back

Never Goin’ Back                              3 ½ stars

Much in the vein of Superbad and Bridesmaids, Never Goin’ Back brings us Angela and Jessie, two teenage girls who are living on their own glide through various bizarre hijinks in their small world in a Texas town. The two girls are without parents and are best friends who work as waitresses in a local restaurant. Angela has a plan to spend a week at the beach to celebrate Jessie’s seventeenth birthday and has spent the rent money on a hotel room. Thus, the girls must scheme to come up with the rent money while dealing with drug dealers, a few days in jail and getting high on some “cookies”. While often vulgar and crude, the movie has a very comedic core made genuine by the talents of the stars, Maia Mitchell and Camilla Morrone who portray the girls as strong women who would die for each other. The movie is loosely based on the memories of writer/director Augustine Frizzell who apparently spent her teenage years in endless mischief with her best friend in a small Texas town. If you can stomach the bathroom humor, projectile vomit and frequent drug use you may want to give Never Goin’ Back a look.

Ma Rainey’s Black Bottom

Ma Rainey’s Black Bottom            5 stars

There are some truly commanding performances in the George C. Wolfe directed Ma Rainey’s Black Bottom (on Netflix). Viola Davis stars as the legendary 1920’s blues singer Ma Rainey in the film based on the August Wilson play of the same name. Alongside her is Chadwick Bozeman as the ambitious cornet player, Levee. This was to be Bozeman’s final performance as he unfortunately passed away last year. The movie is set in 1927 Chicago with most of the story centered around a recording session for Ma and her band as the members of the band and her white manager wait on Ma’s late arrival. Davis gives us a special performance portraying the domineering performer of the blues who won’t let any man walk over her, be he black or white. Her appearance has been transformed with gold teeth and dark makeup giving her a formidable look. Although the movie focuses on the recording session, it is really a way to show the racial injustices that existed for black Americans in the Jim Crow era. We hear examples of it in the stories the characters tell and in their treatment by the white men around them. Ma even says “They don’t care nothing about me. All they want is my voice.” Bozeman also makes the movie exceptional with his character’s dialect and confident nature who wants to break out on his own as a songwriter with his own band, but then falls victim to prejudice and his own temper. Bozeman is nominated for the Academy Award for Best Actor and has to be the favorite to take the statue. Viola Davis already has one Oscar for Fences, also based on an August Wilson play. She is again nominated for Best Actress and this very could be her second win. The movie is one of a series of movies that Denzel Washington is producing that are based on the works of playwright August Wilson. It will be interesting to see what else there is in store.

The White Tiger

The White Tiger                4 stars

The White Tiger, written and directed by Ramin Bahrani, and set in modern day India tells the story of a poor villager named Balram who goes from working for his granny in a shack of a tea shop to personal driver for a corrupt rich business family and ultimately to entrepreneur. The film, based on a book by the same name, has an involved plot that shows how Balram’s thinking and view of himself changes from obedient servant who will do anything to please his master to a businessman in charge of his own destiny. There is a great deal of imagery and metaphorical references that explains how people’s position in society is set by the caste system. They are compared to the roosters in a coop that are powerless to alter their own fate. Balram ultimately sees himself as the fabled white tiger, a creature of great rarity and unique features. Much of the movie seems comedic, but about halfway through it takes a very dark turn that was hinted at near the beginning. It uses a nonlinear approach to presenting the plot so that the audience has a sense of where the movie is going. The three main actors, Adarsh Gourav as Balram, Rajkummar Rao and Priyanka Chopra as two of his rich masters are all excellent in their roles. They and the supporting cast help to present a convincing fictional story based in truth. The movie’s contrast of the poverty of the villagers and the corrupt ultrarich that make up the cities is dramatic. We see the rich people that may appear to be kind until their own power and wealth is threatened at which point they turn on those around them to protect themselves. The movie is also illustrative of the rise of India’s position in the modern world. The White Tiger is a nominee of the Academy Award Best Adapted Screenplay.

Tenet

Tenet                    2 ½ stars

From the director of Inception and Dunkirk comes a truly mind bending work called Tenet that arrived in theaters last summer in the middle of the pandemic. Christopher Nolan has created an espionage spy thriller featuring time travel with a twist. John David Washington, known for BlacKKKlansman, is simply called Protagonist and is a sort of special agent who must save the world from a weapon sent from the future that is intended to destroy the world. The premise of the weapon, inverted matter that moves backwards through time while interacting with our world is much too involved to try to explain so I won’t even try. In fact one has a hard time comprehending what is going on through much of the movie as people can alternately move forward and backwards. That’s what is wrong with the movie since the more you think about it the less it seems to make sense. This is even implied by some of the lines of Robert Pattinson who plays Neil, a team member of the Protagonist. The film is beautifully shot in many parts of the world which gives it a look of a 007 movie with just as much action. The score is interesting, but I wouldn’t call it exactly musical. Tenet is nominated for Best Production Design and for Best Visual Effects in the upcoming Academy Awards. I found Nolan’s earlier works to be more entertaining than this film.